10-07-2020, 10:34 AM
Steam might be the thing which keeps RS3 alive for those that like this, and there are a whole lot of people around who enjoy RS3. Review bombing it is merely dumb, with no Osrs gold we wouldn't have OSRS now and without RS3 in the future OSRS would require improved revenue which would bring MTX to the fore.
RS3 still actually makes more money than OSRS. Without RS3 Jagex loses a whole lot of revenue and has to make it up somewhere or it simply collapses.
Then you're like me, and we are going to ignore it like we've been ignoring RS3 for ages. No need to fire the match when Jagex gave us exactly what we wanted, which was OSRS.
That's the whole point of consumer reviews, to let potential players are aware that the second an alternative popped up, you jumped ship because the product is garbage. Review bombing is bad, but so is avoiding any negative reviews.
MMOs are ever-changing beasts and not playing for a year or two can really set you out of this loop. In addition to the fact that, there were always choices to rs3. If you adore OSRS and had to wait patiently for it to come out to depart rs3, then you probably enjoy rs3 too, even if you hate some facets of it. Simply leave it alone. Leave the warnings to people who currently play with it.
I don't think he's saying to not depart valid criticism. He is asking people who perform osrs only (I quit runescape years back and didn't arrive back before osrs released on mobile so that I never played with rs3) not to fire the review board just because it's a popular to hate on RS3.
I read some more of OPs comments and he does seem to imply that you need to, for the good of the game, still not leave a negative inspection. I disagree with this opinion but nevertheless think that we should avoid flood the reviews unless you've played and have a legit grievance.
Idk me personally was a few levels off of Cheap Rs gold maximum on the market, or well at least was until archaeology, did quite a bit of PvM, and attempted making an alt on there lately. . I am not saying that is what you're saying by the way just saying it to say why.
RS3 still actually makes more money than OSRS. Without RS3 Jagex loses a whole lot of revenue and has to make it up somewhere or it simply collapses.
Then you're like me, and we are going to ignore it like we've been ignoring RS3 for ages. No need to fire the match when Jagex gave us exactly what we wanted, which was OSRS.
That's the whole point of consumer reviews, to let potential players are aware that the second an alternative popped up, you jumped ship because the product is garbage. Review bombing is bad, but so is avoiding any negative reviews.
MMOs are ever-changing beasts and not playing for a year or two can really set you out of this loop. In addition to the fact that, there were always choices to rs3. If you adore OSRS and had to wait patiently for it to come out to depart rs3, then you probably enjoy rs3 too, even if you hate some facets of it. Simply leave it alone. Leave the warnings to people who currently play with it.
I don't think he's saying to not depart valid criticism. He is asking people who perform osrs only (I quit runescape years back and didn't arrive back before osrs released on mobile so that I never played with rs3) not to fire the review board just because it's a popular to hate on RS3.
I read some more of OPs comments and he does seem to imply that you need to, for the good of the game, still not leave a negative inspection. I disagree with this opinion but nevertheless think that we should avoid flood the reviews unless you've played and have a legit grievance.
Idk me personally was a few levels off of Cheap Rs gold maximum on the market, or well at least was until archaeology, did quite a bit of PvM, and attempted making an alt on there lately. . I am not saying that is what you're saying by the way just saying it to say why.